Recently Jon Stewart had a man named Andrew Harper on the show who works for the U.N. in a refugee camp in Jordan.  The area of course is flooded with refugees from Syria.  Jon talked about how much of a hero this guy is for doing this every day.  It can’t be easy.

From Heroes Wiki

An interest concept to me is the idea of a hero.  It feels like to me that those we laud as heroes are often not the ones we should.  Maybe this is cultural and is not true everywhere.  Is there such a thing as a true hero or is it always subjective to a particular person or culture?  I am sure most would agree that the latter is more the case. Although I always find it interesting how much people want to get you to appreciate what they consider a hero.  Maybe it’s the same sort of mentality that convinces someone to push a belief system on you.

The subjectivity of a hero made me think about military heroes.  I find this to be the be a bit paradoxical at times.  In the U.S. there is a strong emphasis over all others to consider those in the military as heroes.  It occurs to me that an enemy to a warring nation has their heroes too, so can the person that kills Americans be a hero and also the American who kills the enemy be a hero?  Who has the moral authority?  The one that wins the war? Of course each side would not consider the other to have heroes even though arguable both fighters would be brave, adept, strong, etc.   There is also a strange dichotomy between those in the military and then the larger context of the war itself.  There is no doubt in my mind that the men and women are brave and heroic for being willing to put their life on the line.  But what if the war is unjust?  I am sure Nazi Germany had their heroes; ones that were elevated to hero status for killing the most allied soldiers or even killing the most Jews.  In the context of their fight those people were heroes.  We of course would not view them as such.

In Shakespeare’s Henry V, King Henry pretends to be a soldier and walks among his men to gather their mood.  At one point he questions one of his men, well what if the cause be unjust?  The man simply responds that if the war is unjust it is matter for the conscience of the King who leads them into battle and not the responsibility of the soldier. This idea makes me uncomfortable,  and of course was not supported during the Nuremburg trials, and probably with good reason.  And though it makes me uncomfortable I still find some merit to it. It must still be a difficult choice though, to know you will be jailed, possibly killed for not supporting your country’s cause.  In a democracy perhaps we are all responsible for fighting an unjust war.  So perhaps the soldier is a hero, since in a way many are responsible for giving that soldier the motive even if it is not a just motive.

Of course heroes are someone that we connect with.  Some people connect with military heroes, I perhaps do not connect as much with them as those who take part in humanitarian efforts.  It bothers me that these people are not celebrated in the same way we are asked to celebrate those in the military.  Support of our troops does make a difference to their morale, so shouldn’t we also support the tireless efforts of those who bring humanitarian relief to people who are struggling?  There is a lot of it in this world and these people also work long hours, in less than ideal conditions to provide aid and relief to others.  Do their tales not deserve the spotlight are they not the source of inspiration?

And how often do we praise the everyday heroes?  What about people who volunteer in soup kitchens, good cops, firefighters, or teachers, doctors and nurses who go the extra mile?  What about a single mom who works hard every day to support her children and give them a chance for something more in life?  Should we define heroism only by the level of danger that one faces?  It seems like this is the most commonly used criteria.  The one thing that seems clear is that true heroes do what they do because they are driven to do so, and not to be elevated by society at all.

Many heroes have their flaws too.  I am sure there are bad days when they want to give it all up.  They may be extremely good at what they do for people, but as a result neglect other parts of life and thus not live up to our elevated expectations of morality.  Nobody is perfect, not even heroes.  Perhaps the best we can do is try to be heroes ourselves while at the same time never forget to celebrate all those who demonstrate the best in human virtues.  They are all equally as important.  A person who is willing to die for our freedom should be at least as important as one who is willing to live for our freedom.

6 thoughts on “Heroes

  1. As always Swarn, we are writing at the same time questioning our moral outlook.

    In short, war is always unjust. It is a fight against humanity, killing humans. Each country having its battle over its way of life. The loss is loss and never to gain. We have cemeteries filled with memories of war. And yet when it comes to Memorial Day, who remembers its true authentic meaning, while gathering around a barbeque fire, drinks in hand, who is remembered. Where are the heroes, what country did they fight for and why?
    Since the dawn of time we have fought, mankind has fought for its right to be alive. We fight the weather, we fight for our freedom. Freedom?? Do we fight for freedom from war? Could this be the last hero standing, one that would not war?
    New posting also


    1. You are quite correct. War is always brothers and sisters fighting each other, because we are all of the human race, and when we war something has gone horrible wrong somewhere along the way. When I think of the massive amounts of death at the hands of someone like Hitler it is difficult for me to fathom another solution that does not involve war, but perhaps there was. But is that solution only available in hindsight? When you search history you always find events that led to war. Stupid decisions, that had they been different maybe war wouldn’t have happened. I think even if war is a mistake there are other mistakes that are just as bad as war, because they lead to war, or make a war even more violent and deadly than it should have been. Either way it is not really my place to judge the soldier necessarily, although I always find it strange to enter a hierarchal system that encourages me not to question things and for which orders are given along a chain of command in which I don’t even have the ability to ask why when given an order to go somewhere to kill people. I think there are definitely heroic soldiers, who despite that hierarchal structure try to maintain their humanity as much as possible under such trying circumstances.

      In this idea of hero, I think we just also need to celebrate more versions of a hero. More virtues. More humanity which is not subjective to king and country but has more universal values. There is strength in character, courage, and moral fiber in many who walk this Earth and most of them will never carry a gun, be very rich or famous. I just hope we can remember to admire those people as much as anyone else.


  2. Pingback: Hero Worship | Cloak Unfurled

  3. Pingback: Standing on Higher Ground | Cloak Unfurled

  4. Pingback: A Quick Word About Heroes | Cloak Unfurled

  5. Pingback: Of Babies and Bathwater – Cloak Unfurled

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s